Presidential Election 2027Probabilities of winning, recalculated every day

Our approach

We have no opinion. This site gathers public data on the 2027 presidential campaign and shows what they allow us to say, and what they do not.

Who we are

An independent project, with no link to a party, a candidate, a client or an advertiser. Nobody has told us what to show, and nobody reads our results before they go online.

What we do

We aggregate three public sources: polls published by pollsters, betting-market quotes and press articles. Every day a statistical model recomputes, from the polls alone, each candidate's probability of reaching the second round and of winning. We always show the uncertainty interval next to the figure, the date and pollster of each poll, and the headline of each article with its publisher and a link to the original.

What we do not do

  • We do not call for a vote, neither for a candidate nor against another.
  • We judge neither programmes nor people.
  • We do not present the model's results as an opinion: they are numerical estimates, with a margin of error.
  • We do not comment on the motives of candidates or of newspapers.

The same treatment for everyone

Candidates are always ranked by a number (probability, score) or alphabetically. All have the same profile, the same chart size and the same kind of landmark. Colours only tell the curves apart: they express neither a judgement nor a political family. In the press, each article carries the name of its publisher; we show sources from the whole editorial spectrum and the count by title.

The limits of the model

  • The model only knows published polls. It ignores any event they have not yet measured.
  • Polls get it wrong: the historical error is built into the interval, but the calibration rests on only two elections (2017 and 2022).
  • The second round is simulated from head-to-head polls when they exist, and from an estimated vote transfer otherwise. This share is shown on the "Method" page.
  • Betting markets are shown for comparison. They have their own biases and sometimes thin liquidity: the gap with the model does not say which one is right.
  • A probability is not a prediction: 20% does not mean "will not happen".

Funding and independence

This site makes no money and seeks none. It has no advertising, no paywall, no client and no sponsor, and we sell no data. Its mission fits in one sentence: to make public information about the campaign clearer and quicker to consult. Our lack of opinion is a commitment, not a pose: if a result seemed to us contrary to what the site "should" show, we would publish it anyway.

Photographs

Candidate portraits come from Wikimedia Commons and are used only under a free licence (CC BY, CC BY-SA, CC0 or public domain). All are shown at the same size and in the same frame; a person without a free photo is shown with their initials. Author, licence and source page of every image are listed below and under the photo on the candidate's page.

Corrections

No correction published to date. Any error found will be corrected here, dated and explained.

The rules specific to polls (law of 19 July 1977) are detailed in the legal notice. Legal notice