Presidential Election 2027Probabilities of winning, recalculated every day
Édouard Philippe
Photo: Wasasaq8, CC0, Wikimedia Commons

Candidates

Édouard Philippe

HOR — Horizons

Profile

Experimental · automatically generated (local model) from Wikipedia and the press — may contain errors.

Édouard Philippe, former Prime Minister and mayor of Le Havre, is a candidate for the 2027 presidential election under the banner of the Horizons party. He has been placed under the status of assisted witness in a judicial investigation concerning suspicions of embezzlement of public funds and favoritism in Le Havre. His campaign takes place in the context of a debate on organizing a primary for the right and center, while being marked by criticism of his ideological positioning and media visibility.

Strengths

  • The placement under the status of assisted witness, rather than formal indictment, is presented as a procedural step that temporarily distances the prospect of immediate judicial prosecution. France Info · 30 Oct 2026 ; Le Nouvel Obs Centre-left · 30 Oct 2026
  • According to L'Opinion, the candidate is attempting a strategy aimed at attracting a broad electorate by combining firm positions on immigration with a claim to fight against racism. L'Opinion Centre-right · 28 Oct 2026
  • He benefits from regular media exposure, being invited to television panels to discuss the primary and social mobilization. TF1 Info · 31 Oct 2026

Weaknesses

  • According to Libération, his analyses of urban violence are criticized for establishing a link between looting and immigration, which is described as an ideological shortcut. Libération Left · 31 Oct 2026 ; Le JDD Right · 29 Oct 2026
  • Media outlets report a difficulty in distinguishing himself from Emmanuel Macron's record, with analysts mentioning a risk of being overshadowed by other candidates from the central bloc. RFI · 31 Oct 2026 ; France Info · 30 Oct 2026
  • According to Le Parisien, his campaign is described as evolving in an unstable context, while potential rivals assert their ability to defeat him in a primary. Le Parisien Centre ; Le Parisien Centre

Text from Wikipedia (CC BY-SA 4.0)

Polls and trend

Dots: one first-round poll. Line: model average. Band: 80% interval.

How to read this chart. Each dot is a published poll (pollster, end date of fieldwork); the line joins the average score estimated by the model. Hover over a dot to see the pollster and sample size.

Learn more

Polls from different pollsters are not directly comparable: each has its own method and usual bias, which the model corrects in part. The spread between dots on the same day reflects this diversity as much as statistical uncertainty.

View the figures as a table
DatePollster1st-round scoren =
22 Oct 2026Cluster1717.0%3000
22 Oct 2026Cluster1716.0%3000
22 Oct 2026OpinionWay12.0%973
22 Oct 2026Ipsos14.0%1500
22 Oct 2026Ipsos15.0%1500
22 Oct 2026Ipsos13.0%1500
21 Oct 2026Harris Interactive16.0%2094
21 Oct 2026Harris Interactive13.0%2094
21 Oct 2026Harris Interactive15.0%2094
19 Oct 2026Ifop12.0%1928
19 Oct 2026Ifop13.0%1928
19 Oct 2026Ifop12.0%1928

Estimated share and uncertainty fan

Experimental: this block does not feed into the probability of winning. Left of the vertical line: dots are polls, the line is the smoothed median of the estimate, the pale band its 80% interval. Right: the state estimated on the day of the last poll, carried forward 28 days with the same random walk; three nested bands hold 50, 80 and 95% of the draws. It measures the uncertainty of the estimate; it does not announce the vote.

Experimental · does not feed into the probability of winning

Experimental: estimated share of Édouard Philippe and uncertainty fan Last smoothed median: 13.4% on 22 Oct, from 33 polls. Fan at 28 days: 50% of draws between 12.8 and 13.9%, 80% between 12.2 and 14.4%, 95% between 11.7 and 15.1%. 0102030 Share of voting intentions (%) 24 Apr17 Aug10 Dec3 Apr27 Jul19 Nov Date 24 Apr · Odoxa · 20.5 %19 May · Harris Interactive · 21.0 %7 Oct · Harris Interactive · 16.0 %28 May · Ipsos · 14.0 %8 Jul · Harris Interactive · 14.0 %9 Jul · OpinionWay · 18.0 %10 Jul · Elabe · 14.0 %24 Jul · Cluster17 · 18.0 %19 Aug · Harris Interactive · 14.0 %25 Aug · Ifop · 14.5 %28 Aug · Elabe · 14.5 %1 Sep · Cluster17 · 18.0 %2 Sep · Ipsos · 14.5 %3 Sep · OpinionWay · 15.0 %9 Sep · OpinionWay · 15.0 %9 Sep · Ipsos · 14.0 %10 Sep · Harris Interactive · 14.0 %10 Sep · OpinionWay · 15.0 %16 Sep · Cluster17 · 19.0 %21 Sep · YouGov · 12.0 %24 Sep · Harris Interactive · 13.0 %29 Sep · Ifop · 16.0 %7 Oct · Odoxa · 17.0 %8 Oct · Harris Interactive · 13.0 %14 Oct · OpinionWay · 12.0 %15 Oct · YouGov · 10.0 %15 Oct · Cluster17 · 17.0 %16 Oct · Elabe · 13.5 %19 Oct · Ifop · 12.0 %21 Oct · Harris Interactive · 13.0 %22 Oct · Ipsos · 13.0 %22 Oct · OpinionWay · 12.0 %22 Oct · Cluster17 · 16.0 %
  • Poll
  • Smoothed median
  • 80% interval (past)
  • 50% fan
  • 80% fan
  • 95% fan
  • Carried-forward median
  • last poll

How to read this chart. Horizontal axis: time; vertical axis: the share of voting intentions, in %. Dots are polls, the line is the median of the estimate. After the vertical line the bands widen: the further from the last poll, the less certain the estimate.

Learn more

The three nested bands hold 50, 80 and 95% of the draws of the estimated state, carried forward with the same random walk as the opinion model; they contain neither future polls nor the vote itself. Validation shows this layer's intervals are too narrow: read them as a lower bound on uncertainty. The table under the chart gives the same values as numbers.

View the figures as a table · Fan values
Estimated share in %, by percentile of the draws.
Days after the last pollDatePercentile 2.5Percentile 10Percentile 25Percentile 50Percentile 75Percentile 90Percentile 97.5
022 Oct12.712.913.213.413.613.814.0
729 Oct12.412.713.013.413.714.114.4
145 Nov12.112.512.913.313.814.214.7
2112 Nov11.912.412.813.313.814.314.9
2819 Nov11.712.212.813.313.914.415.1

Probability of winning, day by day

Line: main scenario. Band: spread across poll scenarios (min–max).

Reconstructed curve: the model replayed day by day on the polls already published. Days without a recent poll are missing.

How to read this chart. The line is the candidate's probability of winning over time, the band its uncertainty interval. It is reconstructed day by day on the polls already published.

Learn more

A falling probability does not say the candidate is "losing": it says that, given the known polls, a smaller share of simulations has them winning. The model knows neither manifestos nor events, only the numbers.

Second-round head-to-heads

How to read this table. Each line pits two candidates against each other in the second round. The first table gives the score of head-to-head polls; the second, the share of simulations in which the first named wins.

Learn more

Head-to-head polls test specific pairs on a given date; the model, for its part, simulates all possible pairs from the first round and vote transfers. The two figures can therefore differ without contradicting each other.

Second-round polls

Le Pen – Philippe55.4% 53.3–57.6 9 polls, latest on 22 Oct

80% interval — Second-round polls : 1st-round score A.

In the press

What newspapers write is not voter support. None of these figures enters the probability.

How to read this table. The list shows recent articles in which the candidate is mentioned, with headline, outlet and date. Each headline links to the original article.

Learn more

The number of mentions measures press attention, not opinion: an article may be favourable, critical or purely factual, and the site does not judge. The outlets tracked cover the whole spectrum; their list is on the "Press" page.

Mentions : 77

What the markets say

No market quotes this candidate.